GENDERED SURVEILLANCE IN THE DIGITAL AGE: A FEMINIST POSTHUMANIST ANALYSIS OF SANDRA NEWMAN'S JULIA (2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62533/n15vg580Keywords:
surveillance, feminism, posthuman, digitalization, data, monitoring, algorithmsAbstract
The present study examines the reconstructions of the concepts of surveillance, embodiment, and agency in Julia (2023) by Sandra Newman, guided by the theoretical perspective of Feminist Posthumanism as developed by Rosi Braidotti. The paper examines how Newman reimagines the dystopian world of George Orwell’s 1984 through a feminist lens, articulating the gendered experience of being surveilled in the twenty-first century—an era characterised by algorithmic visibility, digital surveillance, and affective regulation. Specifically, the study anticipates the way modern regimes of digital surveillance selectively and systematically regulate women and their bodies, emotions, and virtual presence, and replicate patriarchal structures of control using technology. In examining such dynamics, a close reading of the novel has been conducted based on the framework introduced by Braidotti, focusing on the posthuman aspects of Julia's character as she navigates power through her body, emotions, and relational networks (Braidotti, 2022). This discussion reveals that surveillance, as practised by Orwell, was both institutional and ideological; however, Newman predicts twenty-first-century controls based on data, emotion, and connectivity. Furthermore, the study reveals that surveillance in Julia functions as a form of domination where care, embodiment, and moral resistance are redefined. This research contributes to feminist Posthuman scholarship and surveillance research by demonstrating how Julia, in Newman’s work, critically engages with gendered forms of algorithmic and affective government, shedding new light on agency and resistance in the monitored realities of the twenty-first century.
Downloads
References
Amnesty International. (2018). Toxic Twitter–a toxic place for women. Report.
Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and widespread misogyny. Duke University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Polity Press
Braidotti, R. (2022). Posthuman feminism (p. 22). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation (Vol. 314). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Enock, F. E., Stevens, F., Bright, J., Cross, M., Johansson, P., Wajcman, J., & Margetts, H. Z. (2024). Understanding gender differences in experiences and concerns surrounding online harms: A short report on a nationally representative survey of UK adults. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00463.
Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Manifestly Haraway (Vol. 37). U of Minnesota Press
Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: monitoring everyday life.
Maddocks, S. (2018). From non-consensual pornography to image-based sexual abuse: Charting the course of a problem with many names. Australian Feminist Studies, 33(97), 345–361.
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four, London. Secker & Warburg.
Posetti, J., Shabbir, N., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., & Aboulez, N. (2021). The chilling: Global trends in online violence against women journalists. New York: United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF).
Vogels, E. A. (2021). The state of online harassment (Vol. 13, p. 625). Washington, DC: Pew Research Centre.
Zaib, K., Ahmed, S., & Al Murshidi, G. (2025). Exposed online, endangered offline: The intersection of social media presence and gendered violence in Pakistan (Vol. 3, No. 3). Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17068854
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, ed. PublicAffairs, New York.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
N.A